Engine capacity bordering class designations

Other News, Views and topics.

Moderators: DLRA, Rob Carroll, OLDtimer, outbacktrev, Peter Noy

Post Reply
poeee
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:12 pm
Location: Geelong, Vic

Engine capacity bordering class designations

Post by poeee »

I'm contemplating building a car for what you guys all love. Just gathering information and understanding the rules before I make a decision about which way to go.

Class will be 'PRO'. Looking at running a 998cc engine. Now of course that falls in to 'I'. However, with engines that are all at least 30 years old, it's tough finding one that doesn't need a rebore, and then it's even harder finding pistons to suit the application that are std size (flat top to raise compression).

I believe +020 pistons are common. This gives you a bore size of 2.5620". With the stroke at 3", it gives you 61.86277226912832 cubic inch or 1013.7491102911296 cc. From my understanding 'I' is 46 - 61 cid or 0.76 - 1.00 L, and 'H' is 62 - 92 cid or 1.01 - 1.50 L.

So it's bigger than 61 cubic inch, but smaller than 62 cubic inch.

Of course I don't want it to be in 'H' as it will effectively be two thirds the size of what can run in that class.

Please help me understand the rules in this instance.
Scott Pocock
www.ausmini.com - Australian Mini Forums
User avatar
Lynchy
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:12 pm
Location: Brisneyland

Post by Lynchy »

Sorry - can't help myself....

What if you start with a 997cc motor??

I'd say based on the strictest interpretation of the rules you would be in H, but I haven't heard of any motors in Aus being torn down for a measure.
poeee
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:12 pm
Location: Geelong, Vic

Post by poeee »

997 engines are very hard to find. Different stroke based on an 850 engine. I have 1/2 a dozen 998 engines sitting at home! :lol:

Another option is find a 970 crank, which uses the same block as a 1275. The 970 was specifically designed for under 1L competition. Again, those cranks are extremely rare and really the only way to get one is buy a billet crank. Adds to the costs, and although I do have a few 1275 engines sitting here, it's not making the best of what i've got laying around.

I think I have some more thinking to think about. :P
Scott Pocock
www.ausmini.com - Australian Mini Forums
ben james
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by ben james »

everybody hide , the mini geeks have found us again :P
ben james dlra#389
moriwaki monster.
momec
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:15 pm

Post by momec »

Welcome aboard

62 is H so therefore 61.99999999 can only be I.

Go for it.

Chris
Acme Racing #251
fredeuce
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:39 am
Location: SA The Wino State

Post by fredeuce »

Should be able to use a Morris Minor block which came with same stroke as a 998 but slightly smaller bore from memory. They came in at 948cc.

Looking at the manual the 948cc block has a bore dia. of 2.478 whereas the 998 is 2.543 . You might be able to stretch one of those older blocks to standard 998 bore and know that you will still be under 1 litre.
fredeuce
poeee
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:12 pm
Location: Geelong, Vic

Post by poeee »

More researching (on my website haha). Using an 850 block and crank, you can bore it out and fit 998 pistons and 998 rods. The block will need to be decked a bit to suit the piston height. Now for a 'Mini geek', using an 850 block and crank is a very romantic idea. Although my head says use a 998 crank as they are stronger. Waiting to hear about the availability of good flat top 850 pistons.

Also turns out that top quality flat top 998 pistons can be easily purchased new. So that just means finding a 998 block with top condition std bores (not likely!). It was also common back in the day to fit 998 or 1100 cranks and pistons in a bored out 850 block, so using that idea could get get nice fresh bores in std 998 size.
Scott Pocock
www.ausmini.com - Australian Mini Forums
User avatar
Cookey
Member
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by Cookey »

Have you talked with JP Pistons at Windsor Gardens SA?
Cheers,
Tony Cooke
DLRA # 363
poeee
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:12 pm
Location: Geelong, Vic

Post by poeee »

I have heard of people getting 850 pistons from there. Might enquire about pricing.
Scott Pocock
www.ausmini.com - Australian Mini Forums
the randy dero
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: Blacktown, NSW.
Contact:

Post by the randy dero »

Leigh Russell drove a Suzuki hatch from Brisbane to The Lake with a race engine in the passenger seat. Raced it and drove it home. Smaller than a mini but went heaps better. What a story that joker is. The only reason to use mini parts is to set the Salt Lake Breakdown Record. BMC parts are sooooooooo passe.
Stephen
nitro-nige
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:38 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by nitro-nige »

I don't have an SCTA rule book but I think they use 46.000-61.999 for I and 62.000 to 92.999 for H.
So I imagine similar would apply to DLRA.
Ask the chief steward.
Rob
Posts: 1095
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Richmond, NSW. DLRA #888

Post by Rob »

I'm with Chris,

Anything less than 62CID and greater than 46CID is "I".

You have 4 and a bit months, get to it.

Rob
I owe, I owe, so off to work I go.
User avatar
Last Minute Racing
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:20 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills DLRA#928

BMW K100 head on mini

Post by Last Minute Racing »

What BMC should have done

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H70vEq_FMvs

See you all at the Lake all going well

Thanx
Dave
Post Reply